Originally posted March 2010

Recent studies have accorded great importance to the role of transnational migrant community networks in international migration.[1] According to Hourani and Dabbous, there are several prerequisites for the development of such networks, including the presence of the migrant community in different parts of the world, diverse transnational relations — financial, commercial, political, religious rituals, or family ceremonies — and visits between the migrants and relatives in their country of origin.[2]

The creation of the Lebanese community in Nigeria, as well as its contributions to Nigeria’s economy, began with the arrival of the first Lebanese immigrant, Elias Khoury (who hailed from Miziara in the northern part of Lebanon), in Lagos in 1890.[3] There followed other Lebanese families, and the formation of this community and the related transnational network began to expand. Advances in transportation and communication have strengthened transnational networks of Lebanese-Nigerians between Lebanon and Nigeria as well as between the various Lebanese migrant communities in other parts of the world.

Community Creation and Network

Economic prosperity, capital formation, investments, and socio-cultural development, have all been attained as a result of the various components of networks (i.e., family members, friends, business contacts, etc.) used by the Lebanese community. In a survey conducted in Lagos, Kano, Ibadan, Port Harcourt, Calabar, and the villages of Miziara, 80% of the interviewees claimed that their migration and the success of their enterprises in Nigeria were due to such components.[4] The networks have provided information to “help migrants reduce uncertainty and mitigate risks and thereby help them overcome traditional barriers associated with moving.”[5] They have helped to support migrants financially, psychologically (through the provision of a social community), and instrumentally by assisting migrants to assimilate into their new community.[6]

The family is the main refuge for members of Lebanese society. Indeed, Lebanese turn first to their families for assistance in almost every aspect of their lives, including migration. The kinship contract “has been grounded in material realities. Kinship relations have been, for the Lebanese, the core of social identity, economic stability, political security and religious affiliation and the first, often last line of care. It has been kin against whom one has had irrevocable rights and toward whom one has had religiously mandated, at times legally prescribed, moral responsibilities.”[7]

Lebanese-Nigerians have used modern means of communication such as telephone, fax, text messages, video, letters, and photos to remain connected with their families not only in the Christian village of Miziara and the Muslim village of Jwayya but wherever they are located.[8]This aspect was confirmed by various returnees interviewed in the villages of Miziara and Jwayya.[9]

Family Support through Remittances

Remittances are by far the most outstanding aspect of the network through which the Lebanese-Nigerians have been able to improve the lives of their families and their relatives in the villages of Miziara and Jwayya, as well as in Nigeria. Remittances are vital to the lives of residents, especially during times of crisis. Therefore, it is not surprising that they have emerged as critical insurance mechanisms for residents of countries afflicted by economic and political crisis, such as Lebanon during its civil war. During the 2006 war, Lebanese-Nigerians were able to mobilize $500,000 that was sent through the Lebanese Ambassador to the victims of the war.[10]

Indeed, remittances are a fundamental feature of Lebanon’s economy. They represent a sizable proportion of the country’s foreign revenue. In 2001, for example, remittances constituted 22% of household incomes and 88% of household savings in Lebanon. In 2004, Lebanon received $2.7 billion in workers’ remittances.[11] According to a survey conducted in Miziara and Jwayya, virtually all of the household respondents stated that they rely mostly on remittances from migrants in Nigeria for survival.[12]

Transnational Philanthropy

Transnational philanthropy is an adjunct to remittances. This is a process by which migrants in the diaspora allocate a certain portion of their remittances to fund development projects in their home societies.[13] Formal structures, through which migrants make philanthropic donations, include religious, district, village, or other organizations of common interest, non-governmental organizations; and public relations and lobbying associations outside of the home country. In this respect, the Lebanese Ladies Society of Nigeria — a non-profit, voluntary humanitarian organization established in 1975 — has been involved in charitable activities offering scholarships to indigent students and donating to orphans in Lagos. Informal structures include families, broader kinship groups, and friends.[14]

In normal times, migrants donate funds to good causes, such as churches or mosques, construction/renovation, rural schools, cemetery improvements, health facilities, rest homes for the elderly, and orphanages. A typical example of this in Nigeria is the donation of a renovated old family building by the Moukarim family, which the Jigawa state government converted into a hospital (the Faiz Moukarim General Hospital, named after the first Lebanese to settle in the village of Majia).[15] The Hajig family renovated a girls’ secondary school, renovated Government College Birini Kudu, and constructed a 1.5 kilometer road leading to the school in Jigawa State.[16] Similarly, the El-Khalil family helped renovate some secondary schools in Kano State.[17] In the city of Ibadan, Raymond Zard has provided scholarships to 15 students drawn from various universities across the country.[18] In 1992, Chief Marcel Chagouri built the Mother of Mercies religious monastery for the elderly in Miziara village in northern Lebanon.[19] Mother of Mercies also has served as a religious pilgrimage center. The Lebanese Community in Nigeria, which built a Maronite Church in Lagos in 1966, also built churches in the eastern, western, and northern parts of the country.[20]

It is important to emphasize that remittances have not been the only way of maintaining family members in Lebanon. Because of the proximity of Lagos to Beirut by air, Lebanese-Nigerians are able to visit friends and relatives, assist residents during natural and man-made disasters, and gather to address issues related to their country of origin.[21] Lebanese-Nigerians also have been able to contact their families in West African countries, Australia, Western Europe, Brazil, and American cities — trying to build what Hourani and Dabbous have referred to as a “transnational abode.”[22] 

The role of returnees in facilitating and enhancing the various components of network towards developmental activities in both Nigeria and Lebanon, cannot be overemphasized. Members of the first ever Nigerian Trade Delegation to Lebanon (July 28- August 2, 2008) were astonished when they saw the series of development projects undertaken by returnees in the two villages.

Conclusion

Lebanese-Nigerians have succeeded, not only in maintaining contact with their home villages and elsewhere, but they also have forged local-global linkages and transnational networks. By facilitating interactions between Nigeria and the homeland (Lebanon) and among the Lebanese-Nigerian diaspora (e.g., in Australia, Brazil, Britain, Canada, France, and the United States), these links have created a “transnational abode.” They also have fostered the development of e-commerce. Hopefully, Lebanese-Nigerians will use the transnational network to facilitate and enhance socio-cultural and business trading relationships between Nigeria and Lebanon.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1]. Hammar et al., eds., International Migration, Immobility and Development: Multidisciplinary Perspectives (Oxford: Berg, 2000); L. Pries, International Migration and Transnational Social Spaces (London: Routledge, 2001); and A. Portes, “Immigration Theory for a New Century: Some Problems and Opportunities,” International Migration Review, Vol. 31, No. 4 (1997), pp. 799-825.

 

[2]. Hourani and E. Sensenig-Dabbous, “Insecurity, Migration and Return: The Case of Lebanon Following the Summer 2006 War,” Research Report, European-Mediterranean Consortium for Applied Research on International Migration, 2007.

 

[3]. Adebayo, “The Lebanese in Nigeria:The Lebanese and Economy of Lagos,1890-1980,” Unpublished PhD Thesis, Department of History, University of Ilorin, 2003. Though some continue to dispute the arrival date of the first Lebanese to Nigeria, most historians of West Africa accept 1890.

 

[4] Interviews by author in 2000, 2006, and 2008.

 

[5]. D. Leblang, J. Fitzgerald and Teets, “Defying the Law of Gravity: The Political Economy of International Migration,’’ Department of Political Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, November 2006, http://socsci.colorado.edu/-leblang/Research_files/Defying.pdf. Cited in G. Hourani and E. Sensenig-Dabbous, Insecurity, Migration and Return, p. 13.

 

[6]..Hourani and Sensenig-Dabbous, Insecurity, Migration and Return, p. 13.

 

[7]. S. Joseph, “Civic Myths, Citizenship and Gender in Lebanon,” in S. Joseph, ed., Gender in the Middle East (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2006), p. 116.

 

[8]. A. Peleikis, Lebanese in Motion: The Construction of a “Gendered’’ Global Village (Frankfurt: Verlag, 2003), pp. 83-119. See also M. Hudson, “Information Technology, International Politics and Political Change in the Arab World,” Bulletin of the Royal Institute for Inter-Faith Studies, Vol. 4 (Autumn/Winter 2002), p. 118, http://nmit.georgetown,edu/papers/mchudson.htm.

 

[9]. Interview by author with Maxelle Chagouri, Miziara, June 2006 and September 2008.

 

[10]. Wale Olakitan, The Guardian, August 2, 2006.

 

[11]. D. Kapur, “Remittances: The New Development Mantra?,” G-24 Discussion Paper Series, No. 29, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, April 2004, http//www.unctad.org/en/docs/gdsmdpbg2420045_en.pdf.

 

[12]. Interviews by author in Miziara and Jwayya, September and October, 2008.

 

[13]. J. Opiniano, “The Dynamics of Transnational Philanthropy by Migrant Workers to Their Communities of Origin: The Case of Pozorrubio, Philippines,” Fifth International Society for Third-Sector Research (ISTR) International Conference, University of Cape Town, South Africa, July 10, 2002.

 

[14]. Interview by author with May El-Khalil, former president of the Lebanese Ladies Society of Nigeria, October 1997.

 

[15]. Interview by author with Chief Hasib Moukarim, Lagos, Nigeria March 2009.

 

[16]. Interview by author with Mohammed Hajaig, Beirut, September 5, 2008.

 

[17]. Interview by author with Abdul Naser Hajaig, Beirut, September 5, 2008.

 

[18]. “Dr. Are Zard, a Worthy Philanthropist,” Sunday Tribune, Ocober 3, 2004, p. 5.

 

[19]. Interview with Chief Marcel Chagouri, who built the Monastery of the Holy Mother of Mercies, where I spent one month while conducting research.

 

[20]. Daily Times, August 12, 2004.

 

[21]. A. Siedu, “Some Benefits of Migrants ‘Return Visits’ to Ghana,” paper presented at the International Workshop on Migration and Poverty in West Africa, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK, 2003; M. Leichtmann, “Reexamining the Transnational Migrant: The Afro-Libanais of Senegal,” in P. Tabar, Lebanese Diaspora: History, Racism and Belonging (Beirut: Lebanese American University, 2005); and Patricia Nabti, “International Emigration from a Lebanese Village: Bishmizzinis on Six Continents,’’ PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1989.

 

[22]. G. Hourani and E. Sensenig-Dabbous have introduced the term to mean the environment that emerges from ICT use, through the interaction of a migrant or a community of migrants with his/their resident families, friends, or townspeople in the community of origin, and a migrant or a community of migrants with his/their families, friends, or townspeople in other diasporic communities.

 


The Middle East Institute (MEI) is an independent, non-partisan, non-for-profit, educational organization. It does not engage in advocacy and its scholars’ opinions are their own. MEI welcomes financial donations, but retains sole editorial control over its work and its publications reflect only the authors’ views. For a listing of MEI donors, please click here.